Taurus Trade Finance v Mortensen [2009] NSWSC 1156

In this case, a guarantor argued that his liability was limited to one part of the debt. The lender argued that it was an “all moneys” guarantee and that no such limitation could reasonably be read into the terms of the guarantee. The guarantor introduced extrinsic evidence, which the judge found to be unconvincing.

Click here to read the full judgment

Scroll to Top